The Astronomy Nexus is a personal website covering all sorts of topics on astronomy and other interests.

Huge comet outburst!

(h/t Bad Astronomer)

17th to 3rd magnitude in less than 24 hours!

More site updates

I've made a few more changes to the Distant Worlds Star Mapper. The big ones are:

Site updates

I've updated the software behind the site overnight. One big change: you don't need to register to post or view comments. However, every comment field has a captcha (one of those distorted-text-in-an-image thingies) as an anti-spam defense.

Oh yeah, I know -- the current theme could use some work. The old one I had isn't compatible with the site update. I'll probably have a somewhat nicer-looking version up in the next week or so.

Bleh

I've got some pesky spammers here, doing the old "stick a bunch of spam in older posts" stunt, and since it's been pretty quiet the last couple of months, I've turned off commenting for the near future. It'll probably come back after a general site upgrade in the next few weeks...

Site updates: HYG Catalog v. 2.0

I have updated the HYG Database. It now includes the complete Hipparcos catalog (the old version had only stars to magnitude +9.0), and it includes velocity information where it's available.

More details are on the main HYG Database page linked above.

Double vision

April in the northern hemisphere means galaxies -- lots of 'em. But what do you do if you live in the city, can't get to a dark-sky site easily, and it's close to full moon?

How about a few stars, for a change? Recently, I took a look at several bright double stars, for a change of pace from my usual choices of planets and deep-sky objects. More details below.

Star Mapper updates, round 2

I have made another significant update to the Distant Worlds Star Mapper. It now draws much more realistic star images. There are some sample screen shots after the break:

Dwarf tides

In the various discussions about the dynamics of the potentially habitable planet around Gliese 581, the issue of tide-locking comes up. How do we know that a planet like this may face this problem? It's closer to the parent star, of course, but the star is a lot less massive as well.

It turns out it's not too hard to estimate the tidal forces, at least at the order-of-magnitude level, for a clone of Earth put around another star. More details below.

Habitable planet?

Gliese 581, a red dwarf star already known to have at least one other planet, has a potentially habitable planet. It's somewhat larger than Earth (about 5 times as massive), and its average temperature appears to be well within the liquid range for water.

First off, this detection is amazing. Just finding something like this is a challenge; most exoplanets are much more massive, making them that much easier to detect. And then there's the question on everyone's mind: Is this planet truly Earthlike? It's reasonably sized, and could have the right temperature, but beyond that, it's really hard to answer. For one thing, it already has a massive planet, about the mass of Neptune, orbiting even closer still. This complicates the system's dynamics significantly. The smaller planet's orbit is obviously stable in the long term, but even small orbit changes can have significant effects on a planet's climate. As far as I can tell, this is still an open question; astronomers haven't really figured out whether or not a large planet like this would make the smaller, more Earthlike planet uninhabitable. Additionally, red dwarf stars can subject planets to unusually high tides compared to larger stars. In extreme cases, this can lead to a planet having one side always face its star, much as the Moon always keeps one face towards Earth.

UPDATE: The overall dynamics may not be a severe problem. Steinn Sigurdsson writes:

In short, the planet configuration is stable and the inner Neptune mass should have neglibible influence on the middle planet (other than being a spectacular evening/morning star) - only way it would affect the climate on the middle planet is if it affected tidal locking process - the middle planet is just outside a 2:1 orbital resonance with the inner planet - hm, in fact it might be in the 12:5 resonance which is a bit weird - but their final orbital configuration might have been dynamically coupled, this could influence whether the middle planet locked to its orbital period in 1:1 rotation resonance.

Of course, we still don't know enough about the atmosphere, actual temperature, etc. to answer other questions about habitability.

If there were intelligent beings living here, what would they experience? More below.

New site updates

I've made a few significant changes to the Distant Worlds Star Mapper. There are two new features available:

  1. Tooltips for star information
  2. Viewing star charts at different times (the far past and future)

Here's a sample star chart showing both features: this is what the sky from Barnard's Star will look like in 12,000 years. A certain well-known star is identified in the center of the view:


The Sun from Barnard's Star in 14,000 AD

I've created some more examples, and a description of the new features, below the break.

Pages

Subscribe to The Astronomy Nexus RSS